In all, 406 human-fossil individuals which evolutionists feel are crucial in documenting the evolution of modern humans fall into the gap between radiocarbon and K-Ar dating and hence have uncertain ages.Creationists have noted an interesting pattern in evolutionist writings regarding the dating of fossils.Since the morphology of a fossil cannot be changed, it is obvious that the dating is the more subjective element of the two items.Yet, accurate dating of fossils is so essential that the scientific respectability of evolution is contingent upon fossils having appropriate dates.Twenty-eight of them (44%) fall within this time gap.Nineteen of the 222 Homo erectus fossil individuals (9% of the total) likewise fall into this time gap.Because bone is porous, it is subject to ground-water leaching.Hence, the method fell into disfavor because it gave questionable dates.
This gap is from about 40,000 ya (years ago) to about 200,000 ya on the evolutionist's time scale.This problem period may be even larger because: (1) some dating authorities believe that the effective range for K-Ar doesn't begin until about 400,000 ya, and (2) many of the older fossils are found at sites that lack the volcanic rocks necessary for K-Ar dating and hence cannot be dated by this method at all.Although young-earth creationists challenge the legitimacy of all of the dates obtained by the long-term radiometric methods, even evolutionists are beginning to admit that this dating gap presents a problem for them.However, the real seriousness of this problem seems to elude them, even when they occasionally refer to it in their writings. In the past 15 years, the major focus of human evolution has shifted from the origin of "all" humans to the origin of "modern" humans, and the very time during which modern humans are alleged to have evolved from their more primitive human ancestors is the period covered by this gap.At least 406 human-fossil individuals are placed by evolutionists in this 40,000-to-200,000 ya time-period gap and hence are questionably dated. The inability of the radiocarbon and the K-Ar methods to cover this time period explains why many alternate dating methods have been devised to attempt to give coverage in this area.
Search for dating adequate:
Evolution places severe demands upon fossils used to support it.